Maybe it can point the way to where a new Apple Watch-inspired iPod alternative could evolve next: more affordable, pared-down, simpler.Apple in May 2019 refreshed the handheld non-cellular iPod touch for the first time in several years, introducing an improved processor that makes the device faster than before. It's fancier, and it's probably better.but I still like taking that old Nano Watch for a spin. The Apple Watch just might be the new iPod. And it did just a few things, but it did them well. It was decidedly un-social, but somehow more personal.
I'd listen to music and be in my own space. The Nano Watch had something else going for it: it was disconnected. And the Nano didn't need to always be a watch: it could be a clip-on device for your clothing, or a shirt sleeve, or it could sit in your pocket. And you could go up even further, to 16GB, unlike the Apple Watch. The old Nano had its own advantages: a similar amount of storage space (8GB), but more could be used for music: on the Watch, you can only use 2GB for tunes. And it didn't care what sort of phone you owned, or even if the phone was nearby at all.
#Comparing ipod touch prices mac
It also requires an iPhone 5 or newer: the Nano worked with any Windows or Mac computer that could run iTunes. Yes, it comes with a wristband for that price, but it doesn't come with headphones (the Nano did). And, yes, that spinning digital crown.īut the Apple Watch is more expensive: it costs a minimum of $349. Its OLED display is much brighter and crisper than that old Nano display, and is force sensitive. A microphone and speaker for dictating messages and making calls. No need at all to sync with or even sniff a PC.
#Comparing ipod touch prices Bluetooth
And to play music on it, you need to pair Bluetooth headphones: there isn't a headphone jack anymore.Īpple Watch has a whole lot more, obviously: complete and continuous Bluetooth connectivity to the iPhone. It stores photos for wallet-styling viewing. The Apple Watch is a lot like that Nano: it has a different collection of watch faces that are also beautiful to look at. If you used the radio (which I did when I went to New York Jets games at the stadium to follow along play by play), the battery would die in just a few hours. If you used it for fitness tracking during the day, it needed daily recharging. It had decent battery life! The Nano could play music for 24 hours (our CNET test ran for 34 hours), and last for a few days as a wrist-worn clock. From there I could also convert photos from iPhoto down to compressed ready-to-read-on-the-iPod versions, or add podcasts. I needed a 30-pin-to-USB cable to plug into my computer, where I'd be forced to deal with iTunes and hope my music synced properly. It was completely unable to interface with the iPhone. It had to be synced with iTunes! This iPod didn't have Bluetooth: that came in the taller 2012 version, the last Nano to be made to date. When it rained, I pulled down my sleeves. It had a headphone jack, and a big, gaping 30-pin connector, along one side. It wasn't water resistant! Not much, anyway. But it worked, and didn't require battery-powered wireless headphones. It would snake awkwardly down my arm and sometimes dig into my wrist. It had a headphone jack! I could plug my own normal headphones in, and listen to music. It had its own music player, of course, but also an FM radio with DVR-like pause and rewind functions, Nike+ fitness tracking (basically, a pedometer), Voice Memos, a Photos album and an iTunes U mini-app for, well, university lectures. Not just Mickey: Minnie, Kermit and Animal, too. But it did work as a watch: Apple had 18 watch faces on it, including animated ones, round ones, digital ones and Mickey Mouse. Total cost for all of that would have been around $220. And I got a Hex metal band that I tried on it. Part of that was the price: I splurged and paid the extra $20 for the 16GB version.
An iPod for a watch? I bought a Nano that fall, even though I didn't need one. Apple Watch (left) vs iPod Nano (right) with band by Hex. Then the funniest thing happened: people started making wristbands for it. People wondered why it needed to be so small, and so expensive ($129 for 8GB). Small, like a Shuffle, but with a touchscreen. The sixth-gen iPod Nano was a clip-on device. The MacBook Air looked the same as it does now. Lots of things were the same: Marvel movies were still popular in theaters. It was called an iPod.Ģ011 feels like yesterday to me, but it was four years ago. Apple had a product that fit on your wrist. Does the Apple Watch feel familiar? It should.
0 kommentar(er)
